Taking part in the Knowledge Exchange Week gave Eda Doğançay the opportunity to reflect on how several independent Turkish media organisations are innovating to survive, and how collaborating with each other could strengthen the whole media ecosystem. This article is part of a two part series exploring how different media platforms are surviving in Turkey. Read part one here.
In the first part of the article, I explored the resilience and evolution of independent journalism in Turkey. I delved into the strategies employed by two Turkish media platforms that cover comprehensive news categories and aspire to grow into mainstream news channels that uphold objective and quality journalism. In the second part, I will examine the strategies employed by three digital media platforms that specialise in gender-based journalism.
Before diving into these strategies, I would like to share my personal experience as an editor and journalist. My journey serves as an example of the challenges faced by digital outlets that prioritise certain social or political issues, particularly in countries with autocratic governments masquerading as democracies, such as Turkey.
"My journey serves as an example of the challenges faced by digital outlets that prioritise certain social or political issues, particularly in countries with autocratic governments masquerading as democracies, such as Turkey."
Until very recently I was the editor-in-chief of SES Equality, Justice, and Women Platform, which since 2018 has shared news articles and produced original content on gender equality, women’s rights and justice, and women in politics, business and the arts. Founded by the SES Equality and Solidarity Association, the platform was primarily funded by local and international grants, but was unable to secure funding in 2024 and financial constraints meant I had to leave.
While heavy reliance on funding may be seen as a strategic error, it was a necessity given the political and economic climate. Companies were unwilling to advertise with the platform as “women’s rights” is considered a controversial issue under an authoritarian regime. With donations too low to sustain the platform, it laid off its employees in an effort to recover and restart. Although I returned from the Knowledge Exchange week with numerous ideas to help the board redesign the platform’s financial resources, I was unable to implement them. Despite this setback, I remain hopeful the platform will learn from past mistakes and developing innovative strategies to overcome its challenges, and I, myself, hope to put into practice the valuable insights I gained from the Guardian in future endeavours.
Now, let’s look at other digital platforms focusing on gender-based journalism, namely Kadın İşçi, Ekmek ve Gül, and Çatlak Zemin.
The mission-driven model: financing in women’s journalism
Digital platforms that focus on gender-based journalism have a distinct approach, with their commitment to a worldview that supports their mission necessitating a unique business model. These platforms prioritise women’s issues, addressing underrepresentation and advocating for their rights. Consequently, they emphasise accessibility and solidarity and often resist the capitalist norms that perpetuate patriarchy, such relying on advertising revenue. This resistance compels them to explore innovative and sustainable financing methods. Some secure funding through grants; others avoid dependence on external funding altogether, opting instead to collaborate with larger media organisations or operate on a volunteer basis. To illustrate this, let’s consider three examples from Turkey.
A Fight for female labour rights: Kadın İşçi
Kadın İşçi is a weekly digital publication founded by independent feminists including trade unionists, academics, journalists, nurses, students, teachers, factory workers and NGO workers. Launched in 2020 with the slogan “For all our forms of labour, everywhere”. Kadın İşçi focuses on both paid and unpaid women’s labour. Its primary discussion area is women’s paid labour and the workplace violations they face, and its core commitment to feminism serves as its guiding principle.
“The language we use is deliberately accessible, steering clear of academic jargon and English terminology to make the content more relatable to everyday readers,” says Sare Öztürk, an editorial board member. Kadın İşçi does not pursue paid subscriptions or donations, as such methods do not align with its ethical and political stance as a publication dedicated to underrepresented female workers.
After a debate about whether the publication could continue on a voluntary basis, the decision was made to establish an association and seek funding. Currently, Kadın İşçi is sustained by funds from Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, an alternative policy lobby group and educational institution in Germany, and MamaCash, an international women’s fund.
“While this support continues, funders now have their own political agendas, leading to a shift towards projects aimed at strengthening the left in Turkey … MamaCash provides more publication-focused funding, but overall, securing funds for the publication remains a challenge,” notes Öztürk. She says the team debated applying for EU funds but were concerned it could affect its content and be politically incompatible. She adds: “Instead, Kadın İşçi aims for independent and alternative funding sources and has not accepted any advertisements to date.”
To support the publication, Kadın İşçi organises workshops for students and union members interested in women’s labour that aim to teach news-making methods and support the publication with fresh content and perspectives. If funding issues arise, reducing the publication’s scale is an option, but the primary goal remains continuity.
Last year, with support from Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Turkey, Kadın İşçi organised a summer camp in Ayvacık, Çanakkale, a coastal Aegean town. Thirty-one women participated in workshops on paid and unpaid labour, women’s rights, worker health and safety, non-sexist collective agreements, and combating workplace and domestic violence and harassment. Despite budget constraints, the team hopes to continue this camp biannually. Additionally, Kadın İşçi organised a symposium to develop literature and concepts around paid and unpaid women’s labour. The team aims to hold the symposium – which also led to a book – every two years.
These activities increase the publication’s visibility and boost social media reach and readership. “Our aim is not just to publish but also to contribute to feminist methods and literature, maintaining a clear ideological stance,” Öztürk says.
Kadın İşçi began with 34 women, a number that has fluctuated over time. It has a two-person advisory board and two full-time employees, although staffing levels vary depending on funded projects. The publication maintains a network of reporters, ensuring authors are paid for their contributions, adhering to its commitment to supporting women’s labour in every aspect.